Extensions Lauren London

to here some pictures of the Rose Queen.

What is in shades of pink interior belongs to the "Queen Rose", except the little girl with the chancellor that were proposed for the same book characters.




A good end of the year for me is I'm doing, drawing mucho.Acá upload some pictures that are not recent but I do it for display with any order.

Containers For Acrylic Paint

conclusion of this work I wrote these lines printed and hung alongside works.

... we spend much of our artistic and personal life planning, outlining and testing practical solutions or practices to we have ideas spinning in my head.
Over of this work, I come face to work in a relationship is not a concrete project or a one-sided dialogue.
not to pose strict, or resistance to material as if it were of an animal to tame, but instead I find the material in a dialogue of absolute surrender . Looking for the silent approach, that of listening.
I left a picture suggested by a stain, a stain even unexpected.
By transferring the stain to the space I found a way act, I would say, of openness against the material. Letting accidental fact predominate, and giving rise to complicit approach were to suggest what the gesture.
My goal was to lose the fear of the unexpected. Unexpected that appears at every moment in the spontaneous act. vertigo lose vacuum of not knowing what follows, and in turn to dive into the moment with just basic suggestions as guidelines.
Provide the material and trust. trust in what is done as a background. As Modigliani said when referring to his own work:
"Every obstacle that we exceed means a strengthening of our will and our inspiration vital reassurance for the future."
recognize over the development of this work the constant reaffirmation of the Modigliani speaking, and that leads me through the gesture to confirm their own language.

Removing Lcn Gel Anil

Conclusion Tell me








For each person the college degree is worth having received diferente.Para me (Nov. 17) means more time to crear.Aunque probably in see other post balance cosas.Gracias all apoyaron.En I especially Jorge and my mom and dad. Here
post some pictures, which are not very good, but here goes.

Church Annivesary Programs

Sign-thesis degree


some time ago to upload anything because I was not doomed to finish this project I will exhibit in the museum displays Angélico.La Fra Opens Nov. 7.
All are invited.

Infinite Dragon Ball Doujinshi

Comments.

Beauty requires painful sacrifices that, in contrast, generate the supreme works of the soul. Every obstacle that we exceed means a strengthening of our will and our inspiration vital reassurance for the future. " Commentary
Modigliani.1905.

What Is A Scorpio Man Like

Stendhal, Overdose of beauty

too much perception of beauty can be disruptive to emotional stability, as shown by the effects of the Stendhal Syndrome. Six artists appreciate the issue and bring their personal experiences about the phenomenon.

On January 22, 1817, Henri Beyle, a Frenchman aged 34, employed in the military commissariat and decided to become writer, writes in the paper that is currently in Italy and plans to convert into a book: "Florence, January 22, 1817. The day before yesterday lowering the Apennines to reach Florence, my heart was pounding. What nonsense! ".

In 1979, psychiatrist and psychoanalyst Magherini Graziella, director of the Department of Mental Health of Florence and the Psychiatric Service of Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, described the symptoms of the condition called Stendhal Syndrome and first diagnosed in 1982. Sweating, tachycardia, fainting, uncontrollable anxiety or, conversely, prostration. Euphoria mixed with disorientation, a feeling of aversion to a room and even irrepressible desire to harm it. Too much beauty can end up being harmful.

This assault on health, which continues to occur today, has been aptly described as "overdose of beauty." A bad indeed exquisite. Most striking is that in the time that would be expected spew forth the aesthetic pleasure ... skips the challenge from the other side, causing the momentary subject's emotional collapse, now a victim. Much earlier, in 1919, Sigmund Freud and his forays into the inner workings of the human mind, had spoken in his article "The Uncanny", something which could be associated with this, when he pointed la existencia de un no explicitado lazo entre la creación artística y el sentimiento de lo ominoso, suscitador de angustia y terror.

Seis artistas actuales revelan en este número de Descubrir el Arte en qué grado han sido víctimas de este fenómeno, y cómo combatirlo. Para Cristino de Vera, el secreto es ser humilde y observar la obra de arte como a un árbol milenario. “Tú no le miras a él, es él quien te mira a ti”. A Eduardo Arroyo el dulce veneno de lo bello no le afecta, su antídoto es sentir siempre esa emoción, esa alerta que es parte del trabajo del artista.

Guillermo Pérez Villalta, after his stay in Rome, has developed what he called the anti-Stendhal syndrome: experience art as a superb everyday.

Rafael Canogar only the anxiety felt "wonderful" once, at MoMA in New York. For his part, Juan Antonio Aguirre will always yield to the powerful force of color, and Soledad Sevilla him great pleasure to see how the two dimensions of the canvas are able to decompose and expand in space.

By José María Solé and Kristian Leahy.

This

article was published in Discover magazine art n º 114, under Art Theory

Wedding Program Thank You What Did You Write

to death


Ricardo German Political Itinerary

August 3, 2008

AMLO and MEC, with parricide, or filicide

López Obrador, an old lion; Marcelo, a young

The two most outstanding presidential candidates of the PRD, AMLO and Marcelo Ebrard, a previous live political war that could end in parricide, or filicide.

This means that the AMLO son-in-it is clear to everyone that owes Marcelo political life to Tabasco, could be forced political parricide as the only possible way to achieve their legitimate ambitions. That, of course, if not his father-in-because without AMLO, the prime minister would be nothing in the political class decides to sacrifice it to search for the second time presidential candidate.

Just take a look at what happened between AMLO and his political father, Cuauhtemoc Cardenas. Around the first quarter of 2002 in this space we note that Lopez Obrador was preparing a political parricide, as the only possible political solution to become head of the PRD, head left and then a presidential candidate. Against many voices in the end we are insulted, the forecast was completed on time and, indeed, AMLO ended up killing his father-in-Cárdenas, who owed him everything.

Today the roles are reversed and Ebrard attend this dilemma. There are many indications that the story could be repeated: that her father will kill Marcelo political. Because in politics as in society in some cats, like lions, "the parents and children to maintain or achieve clutter power. And what hinders policy-parents or children, must be eliminated.

AMLO, WEAKNESSES

And I said that the roles are reversed because while Cardenas was six years ago defeated presidential candidate still remained, without doubt, The real moral leader of the PRD. But his stepson, AMLO, was holding the real power center, the powerful head of City government, which allowed him to impose his real from real power. Today, Lopez Obrador is the defeated presidential candidate, but still the real moral leader of the PRD. But Ebrard has in its hands the real power, the government of Mexico City headquarters, where does everything to impose their real.

And there are many who say that if Cárdenas remained alive up to three presidential candidates, López Obrador is still alive and has a chance "at least one more chance." Would be right if you talk chronological ages. But the problem is that in politics the years are not the same. Between 1988, 1994 and 2000, were living at birth, childhood and youth of the PRD, are not comparable year-by far-at least it will be 2006 and 2012, where the PRD enters maturity.

Indeed, López Obrador is closer to the image of an old lion that clogging of the image in 1988, 1994 and 2000 showed up Cárdenas, times when it appeared and was the youngest chief , almighty, founder of the herd in yellow.

However, we must remember that among the politicians spent years not in vain, and that in the case of AMLO, the effect is obvious and affects political decisions. When Lopez Obrador had their best moments? On the one hand, in 1996, when he negotiated with Zedillo's arrival, the AMLO to the head of the PRD and the negotiation for the great electoral reform that year, and on the other hand, when despite the illegality of their candidacy, Zedillo renegotiated to make it a candidate for head of the Federal District. And third, of course, when imposed by an unequal bargaining absolute control in the PRD in 2005.

When AMLO has had its worst moments? In the pre-July 2006, when instead of negotiating with owners the great respect electoral capital, confronted them and threatened to pursue, when Fox hit, instead of negotiating a nonaggression pact, when he invented the farce of fraud, very expensive for him and his party, and Today is the PRD and its aspirations on the canvas, and when we threw the stitch order that the project was to overthrow the government of Calderón, by any means.

López Obrador seems old lion, who lost the reflexes and the ability to create, negotiate, discuss and agree with what he leaves all the room for the young lions, like his own son, Marcelo , which aims stay with the pack and power. Still, as good old lion, will fight, but with little chance.

Marcelo, strengths

One of the main strengths-indeed, the strength, the head of government is responsible, the second political and economic power, after the President of the Republic. The fact that you spent 45 million pesos of citizens, without control, without permission and to fund only a minor part of his presidential campaign, talks about the size of the ambitions and the force that imposes its decisions and policies the government chief.

Ebrard is clear that urged him to remove, as quickly as possible, the impact of the case New's Divine. And of course, what better than oil consultation. How media keeps the noise? Public money. Money for hats, shirts, ballots, spots, blankets, banners, advertisements on radio and television.

Ebrard has spent that and many millions more on artificial beaches, artificial ice rinks, massive celebrations of 15 years, shows in the Zocalo so-called museums of art to sell his image as a politician busy and concerned about the poor, social problems and, of course, that is capable of running the largest city in the world, which would put him as the man to driving destinations. His image has grown like wildfire because ultimately what is at stake is the popularity.

And that is the final struggle between AMLO and Marcelo will be defined not a review of the capabilities of each other, the skills as leaders, as politicians, their successes and, above all, of that sensitivity and statesmen. No, the decision of who will in the end the applicant Presidential yellow, between AMLO and Marcelo, is a decision between who is more popular. That is, the most rabid political style trap.

But there is a difference between the potential of Marcelo and the AMLO. It turns out that the first has everything to do from his position as head of government-especially in a city that claims arrangements everywhere, from the security, administration of justice, roads, traffic chaos and street vendors, to organized crime and ... drug trafficking - which he sets aside four years of popularity almost at will, provided they do not go out with another stupid as of the New's Divine ", while AMLO does not have flags to keep his campaign.

The only flag of López Obrador is oil, which sold out and not proposals or positive results from the exercise of politics, but because he was such a radical degree, he went counter radicalization. Today the oil reform is almost a given, which exhausted the only card of AMLO and the PRD, while Marcelo continues to gain ground. And you can reach the final as the only candidate with life. Time.

Is It Bad To Switch From Honors To Regular

The continuing wrong

Reasons Jorge Fernández Menéndez

15-Apr-2008

Eighty-five percent of the population rejects the actions taken by the PRD to "close" (as I have tried always, all the coup) the Congress, as Surveys released in the last hours. To strengthen this impression, the PRD and Lopez Obrador leaders have decided, at least as I write these lines, strengthen your position and insist that they leave the stands if there is a debate in the format, time and even components they want, which should extend at least until August, with the aim of which is crimping the Union address, while maintaining the country paralyzed for more than four months.

When your enemy is wrong, say those who know, should not distract. And López Obrador is wrong with this action as well as with the famous sit-in 2006: no social support, there is a positive impact on the resources (Lopez complained after two months had more coverage than anyone in the political world , that the media have criticized what did you expect?, does Tejero received many compliments when he took at gunpoint English Courts to try to curb the democratic transition?) have unified the other party against and have exposed the internal fractures in the PRD. People have been very bad so far and Lopez can not understand that the rest of the country, their decisions seem esoteric and have no followers. Somehow looking out the problem and said on Sunday: there is a new "complementary", it is media and includes the Supreme Court (is it because you still have open criminal proceedings or for the election of the PRD will end in the Electoral Tribunal? ) and to lift the footage, you must do exactly what it says and try to impose party that has a little less than a third of Congress.

The temptation then is to send as the devil as they send the institutions, as again López repeat on Sunday. It would be wrong. In part this is what these characters want: the use of law enforcement by the federal government. And as you know it is difficult to apply on a group of louts with trade, blackmail that the only way to be endless dialogue proposed. You really have to look at measures that are beyond these two options for further work, if a PRD sector better, if the Stockholm syndrome make it impossible, no way. The police should be and attempts to contain more violent footage of the venues. At the weekend, the idea that they who lead this movement is that calls to take the rooms adelitas session on especially in the Senate. The small detail is that they have no immunity and that can not afford. These groups are small but defiant, somehow must maintain control of the process in a city like Mexico, which guarantees the rights of citizens when to take action against the infantry of his political boss. There they were on Sunday in an act intended to ignore the country's institutions and support measures that violate the law, the Secretary of Government, Social Development and Public Security Secretary capital.

But the issue is the debate: on Thursday, when they took the stands, and was holding Carlos Navarrete agreement to a debate of three weeks, more enough in the case of a subject that has been discussed ad nauseum for years, in order to analyze the sector and enterprise. Even with that the PRD would have prevented the approval of the initiatives during this regular session. Now proposes a 50-day debate and it appears that the FAP also rejected. The choice should be clear: the PRD accepts the proposal or losing it. Because you can move in other ways: for example, what better than a query without limits?, What would happen if Congress opens tomorrow, an internet site for all institutions, all specialists, all citizens who have proposals to do in the matter, to be presented? A space that is open access to review, read, rate. What if the Energy Commission, with a functional advisory committee, appointed by two-thirds of its members, reviews all such proposals in three weeks and then, based on them, make modifications or additions are necessary?, " What would be more universal, more comprehensive, more democratic than a query like this?

At the same time should follow the legislative agenda: the Chamber of Deputies are initiatives of all kinds (about 40) offer a great variety of subjects from secondary education to the appointment of the Comptroller of the IFE. One option may be the alternate sites, but would be otherwise: to make the platform do not need dozens, that some hooligans with rushes jurisdiction over them is enough. Should be legislated in Congress, but sometimes forgets that it is not necessarily in full and these initiatives need only a simple majority for approval: are you prepared all FAP lawmakers not to intervene in these debates and Production of these laws? Ultimately have to take responsibility, are subordinated to what she said Lopez or make their respective decisions.

If the PRD does not want to discuss, do not do it, unless you want to participate in the legislative process, which lies outside, if your officials and leaders believe that one day may be unaware of the institutions and the next day to ask from resources and political support, someone needs to remind them of their contradiction. The continuing wrong and away from people, but someone is responsible for making them pay the bill. In politics nothing is free.

Fabric Coverable Belt Buckles

for the "defense of Pemex" aniqulan the PRD and AMLO

Ricardo German Political Itinerary
El Universal

Sunday April 13, 2008

is not a joke. Are you serious that a good portion of leaders and rulers of the PRD leaders are highly concerned over the cliff to a handful of ambitious lead the party, the most important and influential training Mexican left has reached in its history.

's no joke that the accusation Andrés Manuel López Obrador intends to "a coup" within the PRD, which among others launched the party's number two yellow, Guadalupe Acosta Naranjo. It is seriously some of the builders of the PRD see Mr. legitimate, as the most important leader of the Mexican left, the man who can carry the power that political force, which promotes the transformation of Mexico and finally reached When the less fortunate. No, wise minds in the PRD, which is but do not dare to express themselves public, and see AMLO as an "infiltrator" of the PRI and the right to end the PRD. And no, it is a joke.

And while today they do not say in public, show their faces to express this concern, the fact is that there will be a long time to do so. A year ago, maybe two, no one imagined that the Mutts and Lopistas today is to say what they say in the dispute over control of the party yellow, and the battle of public money. In two, three or four years once the votes charged political clumsiness of Tabasco, many recognize publicly that López Obrador was responsible for the suicide of the PRD, but also strengthening on the right and the return of the PRI to power.

And indeed, if we calmly consider what is happening, with a little common sense and without the passion that leads to fanaticism and messianism of amlistas, come to the conclusion that the legitimate does everything to destroy the left and its most important banner, the PRD, but also destroys their real power centers-who are in Congress, and even seeks to demolish the fledgling and fragile democracy that every citizen has cost us much, but at PRD marginalized and their hard lives. As always, we split. The suicide



Suppose that Mr. López Obrador right, the right perverse blue and tricolor right opportunity to trick the 100 million Mexicans fools we are, of course, and that will make Pemex into a family business. Let us assume that, in fact, the family Mouriño aims to become the modern version of Carlos Slim, as shouting in delirium in the Lopistas-profitable oil business. And let's assume that AMLO and his loyal are lit, sent from heaven to save the country, to redeem the souls of heretics and punish traitors. Let us assume that all this is true.

So if that is true, why destroy the image and influence PRD? What's Not from July 3 AMLO have charge of placing explosives on the pillars of the PRD? What is not political suicide, the so-called peaceful protest? What not to save the oil from the clutches of evil requires a strong party with a legitimate leader? Why, if that is an unquestioned premise, AMLO destroyed the PRD in its ambition to control the game?

Well, let's assume you were wrong, that by walking in the oil binge did not realize they were destroying the PRD, and is understandable, if the government did not realize the scandals Bejarano and Ponce, and have clear everything.
Why then
AMLO and his claque are shooting at the head of its centers of power? What are we talking about?

It is elementary common sense and even logic. But apparently not given to the basics, to common sense and logic. Of course, given for suicide.

What is it, but cut off his head to the PRD, the "closure" of Congress? Okay, for those who do not understand. Where has the PRD political force in the institutional level? What strength and how can the PRD institutional instruments to defend Pemex? Where does the money for the survival of AMLO's movement and oiled to keep a large majority of the party? The answers to the last three questions is: "The representation of the PRD in Congress." Is that clear? But what meant the closing of the Congress by the FAP?

For that, destroy the strength of the PRD in Congress, not only politically, but its image and its side against the already close election 2009. Who in their right mind would vote for the PRD in 2009? Of course, beyond the fans who no longer see or hear, and that at the end of the incongruity and delirium, now justify that AMLO and his chatty, wish to remove basic freedoms, such as expression, no. Remember that protected the left for 15, 20, 30 years? Yes, freedom of expression. What preach today? Close your mouth critics of the Left. Old, many fans today AMLO justify and promote what young defenders. Pure consistency.

Why say that AMLO will be noted in a few years as the head of the suicide of the PRD?

Because the alleged defense of oil, which is more than your "donkey" to come with political life in 2012, destroys the PRD, yellow parliamentary groups and, last but not least, it destroys the nascent democracy. That is, in their struggle for defense of oil called pure Machiavellianism applies: "The end justifies the means." That is, the AMLO power ambitions justify the destruction of the PRD and the nascent democracy. And last but not least, encourage the consolidation of the right and the return of the PRI. Does not it seem a mole?

Not many years ago PRI fans told us "Stalinists" for criticizing the PRI. Fewer years ago PAN fans said that "Government paid us, for criticizing the blues and their governments. Today we say we pay the PAN and the right to criticize AMLO and his PRD insane destruction and nascent democracy. Time will put everybody in place.

Mexican politicians denigrate Farsantes circus performers

For now, with sorrow and shame, we recognize that in seeking to define the frauds of the Mexican political class insult to a group of professionals who, quite rightly, claim that compare them with politicians, Federico Serrano-Diaz, director of Broadcast Atayde Hermanos Circus, offered the next lesson we accept with humility:

"Dear Mr. German, repeatedly in his writings do you references to the circus compared to the national political class. I dare to think it is ignorance rather than bad faith, but the truth is that such comments have helped to degrade the public perception of what is 'the circus': ancestral and live performance art, essentially democratic, and that our country has ancient roots.

"The circus works like clockwork: a trapeze artist can not change their flight path, or a juggler capriciously altering his routine, a trainer of tigers or improvise their act. Behind the circus is all that there is no politics in this country focus, rigor, discipline, evaluation of individual effort and collective self-confidence and on peers, elegance, precision and beauty. It is the art of astonishment.

"On the other hand, the exercise of the circus never hurt anyone, while our politicians, with their stupidity, do harm to millions of citizens. 'I wish the scenario was as narrow as a tightrope rope: it would take many inept the desire to go on stage, "said JW Goethe.

"I would send you some opinions from people more qualified than I do about what is and means the circus, and deserve to be taken into account because they are great artists and thinkers of universal culture:


The real circus
"No I know exactly what the circus has given me, but I saw people risking their lives with an infinite grace and elegance to entertain his fellows, and it seems to me more than enough "Maxim Gorky.

"The circus is the only show I know that while they look, gives the feeling of living in a happy dream": Ernest Hemingway.

"The circus is a small enclosed arena that surrounds us into oblivion for a moment we can leave ourselves to merge into a world of joy and wonder that leads us to the heart of a mysterious universe": Henry Miller.

"Every man, woman or child leaves the circus cooled, refreshed and ready to survive. The circus is a radical break in the pattern of reality: the beauty from ugliness, excitement to boredom ": John Steinbeck.

"Since childhood, from memory to relive the past, and also from the present course, the circus is always a paradise": Vicente Leñero.

"I hope that reading the above quotes help to give you notice, Mr German, the comparisons between the two worlds are not only unjust but a little light and even silly.

"In Mexico, Circo Atayde Hermanos is 120 years old in 2008. And in that time have fallen Porfirio Diaz and the PRI have gestated generations of new rich thanks to the policy, expanded rail and disappeared, there were crimes of State and the 1968 and 1971, and Mexico is very different in those 120 years. However, the circus is still there.

"Of course there are circuses of different standards and quality, as with any other human activity. The same happens with the media, journalists and politicians. That is why we believe it is irresponsible generalization. Therefore, through this channel will show the deep discomfort that causes the community circus that bad policy is presented as synonymous with the circus, which constantly make communicators like you.

"If the Mexican political work as a circus, art would be a perfectly organized, and it is not. We therefore believe that the circus is at odds with the Mexican political class and the demeaning way of doing politics.

"In any case, and with much good will, the truth is that many Mexicans and especially the circus professionals believe that our policy is a farce (comedy short piece), played by a multitude of doodles (person or thing defective. Men do not deserve respect informal), but you can never say that politics is a circus, with acrobats, jugglers and clowns. Do not confuse the terms. Thank you. " So far the letter.



On the way 10 years after his death: I need the opinion of Octavio Paz But it is also true that it would do much good to all politicians to read them. Sure, if you can read!

aleman2@prodigy.net.mx

What Shirt To Wear With A Blue Blazer And Jeans

democracy and intolerance

Francisco Valdés Ugalde
El Universal

Sunday March 2, 2008

Intolerance is the greatest enemy of democracy. So that it builds up it must rest on social prerequisites will not be free, and are not abundant in society and national politics.

infighting in the PRD intolerance has been manifested first in his regular position as a party and then in the internal conflict by directing it. A week ago, Senator Carlos Navarrete was assaulted by supporters of Mr. Andrés Manuel López Obrador. As we know, Navarrete has been detached from the pressures of former presidential candidate of the parliamentary faction in the Senate that coordinates.

Mr. Lopez's game in the PRD internal succession is far from corresponding to the codes of conduct of the democratic left. Their lack of orthodoxy to meet with the agreed rules of internal or external political game to his party is legendary. He despised the law when "justified" their residence in the Federal District candidates for prime minister. So did with the judiciary when a judge ordered him to reverse the illegal appropriation of land by particular government. Attacked and dismantled without regard to Public Government Information Institute Federal District, with the clear objective of preventing this body will oversee the spending of his administration and forced him to account. Something similar done before, by limiting the ability of the Federal District Electoral Institute to monitor adequately the elections in Mexico City in 2003. Also failed to stand up when it was exhibited to light the scandal involving his trusted political operator and financier Rene Bejarano Carlos Ahumada.

In his leadership as a candidate for President of the Republic avoided the debate with their peers in front of public opinion, and only accepted it in the end, it was too late and had fallen dramatically in voter preferences. However, he refused to accept the outcome of the elections and mounted an operation to undermine the credibility of electoral institutions and the results of the 2006 elections. In his hectic

as self-proclaimed "legitimate president" has attempted to scatter throughout the country their views, presented as absolute truths increasingly, only possible for those who ditch stands as sole and exclusive truth and the authenticity of public life . Great finisher of what is right and what should not be even thought.

His most recent update of this handbook has been his stance on energy reform. It has been argued that the very idea of \u200b\u200bcarrying out a reform in this area will be grounds for "violence" and "instability" policy. Anticipated as a prophet what is proposed as a politician. His subsequent conviction of aggression by their hosts Navarrete moved to wonder whether it is genuine or just strategic. Considering his performance, there is no doubt that the restraint and reasonableness have been fading convenience. To deny it is a masquerade, Lopez Obrador has promoted intolerance. His public record is in sight since he came to the fore of national politics. And his party, to a greater or lesser extent, is mounted on the train that leads AMLO against all axiological foundations of democracy.

This behavior has seriously damaged the political space left. The surveys reveal all and nearly all qualified opinions with the exception of que externan (en público) quienes decidieron acompañarlo.

El primer aspecto de este daño a la izquierda y a la democracia en México consiste en que la influyente personalidad pública de AMLO ha conseguido captar no pocas voluntades y crear un imaginario político en el que ha sido ya depositado el huevo de la serpiente. Su talante y lo que anima es contrario al debate, a la ilustración de las posiciones que se defienden, al razonamiento lúcido e informado, a la aceptación, en lo que cabe, de la razón del otro. En suma, es contrario al diálogo, que debe ser nota dominante en todo ambiente público democrático. En consecuencia, es una lección de falso civismo que en realidad promueve los values \u200b\u200bthat are contrary.

Thus, López Obrador López Obrador and undemocratic form and a block that can overwhelm and sink in the dark conservative ("left") to the rest of the PRD. The development of the modern world has shown that the left can advance and develop better assuming the values \u200b\u200bof democracy, because it is the force most capable of deepening them. Including the core, which is tolerance. Without tolerance there is no respect for the "rights of others, tolerance is not possible without peace or freedom without tolerance is diluted the ability to grow morally and disability facing the opponent's errors, base construction policy own. Use quotation marks because it is a value that AMLO Juarez Republic claims to represent.

In countries that has consolidated democracy better, the left has been more influential. I refer not only to the classic examples: the more developed countries which have achieved higher levels of well thanks to the presence of genuine leftist political organizations. I also refer to the countries of Africa, Latin America and Asia. What would India without the struggle of the Communist Party of Kerala? What would be today if Nelson Mandela of South Africa had not understood that the moral leadership of a people to justice begins the moral integrity of the recognition of others and of reality? Why do countries like Argentina, Brazil and Chile have been able to lower their rate of inequality?

None of these questions are answered without admitting that modern organizations and intelligent left have affected the state's power structure and content of government policy with the prospect of building long term, always reaffirming a commitment to democracy.

Today, this is something that López Obrador unfortunately lacks.

ugalde@servidor.unam.mx

Researcher, Institute of Social Research of the UNAM

How To Unlock My Brinks Lock Forgot The Number

Aplastana 'The Mutts'

Ricardo German Political Itinerary
El Universal

Monday March 17, 2008

believed to emerge as winners, but were overtaken by the control strategy of patronage

win Beyond Encinas, was a disgraceful display of politics pursued by the left

is flatly wrong to assume that those in yesterday's election throughout the country, but especially in reservoirs yellow, the PRD was playing his future . In days gone voices often placed alternatives and Jesus Ortega Alejandro Encinas as polar opposites, the closest thing to paradise, in the first case, and hell, in the second.

And they are wrong, because while there are huge differences between the political culture of each other, The Mutts are heirs to a political practice that favors dialogue, negotiation and agreement, and lopiztas placed over any confrontation strategy - what is certain is that both Chuchos as Lopos are two sides of same coin: that of the left, away from their doctrine, it grew to the horns of the moon not because of their ideology and political practice efficiently, but by a successful popular frustration, after the climax begins to see its decline.

close to the time of this article, during the night began to flow information that would have imposed the strategy of López Obrador and Encinas, although during the day data were independent exit polls that gave the New Left candidate Jesus Ortega, a slight advantage over the dolphin's defeated presidential candidate, AMLO, although it was evident throughout the day in all states, municipalities and Federal District's boundaries, where the Chuchos had chances of winning, small attempts to break the election.

is no coincidence that the biggest red flags that saw the election of national leader of the PRD were produced in Iztapalapa and Ecatepec, and generally in the suburbs of Mexico City, where New Left has almost total control of the PRD, as well as the states of Oaxaca and Veracruz, where the allies of López Obrador the convergent Gabino Cue and Dante Delgado, mobilized their tribes to blow the election.

occurred in the eyes of everyone, black hand for Alejandro Encinas.

And apparently gave good result all attempts by the duo Obrador Encinas-election mess in good Castilian, though they did not have another name that electoral fraud attempt within the PRD itself. Basically what we saw was a competition where lopiztas strategies resorted to all sorts of trickery and cunning odd jobs before and during the election, while Chuchos designed a strategy to clear all the mess made by its opponents. And of course, did their thing. It is known, however, that approach would have failed the New Left.

To begin with, and yet, The Mutts will never disqualify a referee, let alone go to court institutional. Neither took a strident stand before the public evidence of cheating and irregularities deployed against him and, in general, never swallowed the hook to open the lower slit the annulment of the internal electoral process.

still the eve of the election on Saturday 15, Mr. Alejandro Encinas reported that he came in anonymously a thousand actual ballots, which presumably would be used to favor Chuchos.

However, the move was so crude that after a quick inquiry into the alleged irregularity was that the ballots thief was identified as a political operator Arturo Nunez, the referee of the contest, Tabasco imposed by AMLO , PRI until months or even legally qualified as a PRD. Neither is Chuchos fell in the provocation to abort, and even when documented theft of ballots and ballot boxes, mice crazy pregnant polls, ballots and plugs in the end, were beaten two members who coordinated the campaigns of Ortega and Zambrano.

But all indications are that the group of Encinas and López Obrador won the victory and avoided tripping over the same stone in July 2006. What do we mean? Easy

that the strategy Chuchos was based on two key variables. First, the lines have already stated above: in the design of antibodies to prevent it from being blown the election and prevent reached the end of the cancellation. And second, that a lot of money, which by the way, nobody knows where it came from, "New Left strategists gave shape to a pyramid structure to carry voters to the polls.

And that structure, it really is an invention of the most refined of the PRI on election-actually designed by the now retired from politics and devoted to journalism César Augusto Santiago, is only the careful design of a voters list, location, attention to their needs and satisfactions, and the conviction to the vote on Sunday leave the house, climb into a truck, a pesera, a taxi, get to the box and vote . That, of course, requires strategy and money, big money. And money was.

But apparently none of that worked. The Mutts believed to emerge as the winners, but were overtaken by another strategy, also PRI, control of patronage. And not referring to their ability to spread his doctrine, party discipline, the effectiveness of their leaders or elected representatives. No, simply that on three occasions, before they had won Chuchos to poor leadership of the PRD. Today I applied the same dose.

In the end, and beyond who wins Encinas, what we saw in a public way is a disgraceful display of politics that is able to deploy the Mexican left, which ever ceases to be for a parent to the old PRI, which has already forgotten the ideas, proposals, doctrine, and advances in the areas of power only from the trap and antibody. And that is left to defend many of the great men of ideas.

aleman2@prodigy.net.mx

Traduzione Testo La Quemona

Left became right

The term "left" comes from the beginnings of the French Revo-lution, when the king imposed a form of parliament, the States General in 1789. Members of the nobility sat to the right of the president and defending the special courts, the tradition and monarchy. Members of the seats on the left called for the disappearance of the monopoly held by the government in certain areas of the economy end of the charters by which the nobility could not be prosecuted for acts against a poor, education for the masses science-based, secular state, and in general, everything that today makes up a democratic regime.

Why did that happen? Because the new productive forces unleashed by science transformed into technology (the Industrial Revolution) were breaking the straitjacket of the old statist legislation, bans full of new businesses. The process was analyzed by Marx in abundance. In short, the "third state", with seats to the left, representing the emerging economic forces, oppressed by legal restrictions to trade and investment. It was inspired by the Enlightenment: that generous intellectual who had written the first encyclopedia, summary of scientific knowledge. In the States General, the sitting to the left wing was struggling for freedom of trade, investment, association, expression, religion, and equality of citizens before the law and social services for the homeless. In this attitude is inspired Washington, Hidalgo and Bolivar to propose independence from Europe and democratic republics monarchies rather than to rule the new American countries.



The Mexican left came to power On our left forgotten ethics: a government that called itself the left, led by López Obrador in Mexico City, did everything, absolutely everything against what we were on the left: we demanded public works concession for open bidding and competition, with transparent prices and costs: López Obrador delivered his magnum opus, the second floor, the companies he decided to change and political support (they were the "good entrepreneurs" who were marching when he asked, because he gave and took away contracts at will). Then, to prevent the application of the Law on Transparency in costs by billions, he managed to René Bejarano, head of the Legislature, state secrets do those numbers, those books, up to ten years. Why, why hide? We only know that thousands of millions of dollars, but payments will be on the safe López for ten years.

And what did Gustavo Ponce, Secretary of Finance of López Obrador, playing in Las Vegas every three weeks? He is in prison because he stopped the PGR, not the capital police. He could not miss his office without authorization from the head, López Obrador. What was Ponce to Las Vegas? What was the official entrusted with? Lopez will be what, less silly. His secretary of finance made him a job. Ponce Encinas, recognizing him, and fled: "Everything I did with Andrew's knowledge." The whistle to escape Lopez had given him urgent news conference. The federal government has to Ponce in federal prison. But the PAN demonstrates every day that is green to exercise power and is "fully Palace." Ponce case management has been nil. Instead, there are people who still claims that there was fraud but no one has managed to explain, nor López, how committed a fraud-proof system. Was the coup.

Whoever said "indestructible" came to the baseness to accuse their representatives have been sold box, could not give a single name or the amount for which sold. And yet, managed to install the fraud in the collective belief of millions. Now do the same: it requires transparency in contracts for 40 million the same character that denies us transparency in the billions. Requires who never gave them accounts for the contributions of pirate taxis, street vendors, by Pancho Villa who served the PRI and the PRD now because they serve the highest bidder.

A Mouriño not sink Lopez's complaint, it plunges the eternal suspicion of Mexicans who can not believe that have a principle of democracy, that his enemies are the unions of electricians and oil, not investors in Cuba explore and exploit oil fields in China and produce electricity without thereby Cuba and China are disappearing.

The Mexican left charters fought 150 years ago today reinforces, and today is against freedom of investment and trade: who made the prosperity of the developed world. What they call "left" is what Juárez Gómez Farías called "reaction." We are in the hands of a reaction brash and cocky.

Luis González de Alba - 167

Copyright © Group Editorial Milenio 2008

Leukemia Damages Liver

Today may be fraud president Ugalde glitch and a new path of Peje

Ricardo German Political Itinerary
El Universal

Sunday March 16, 2008

of involution that denies Darwin to Stockholm syndrome
For
where you want to see, what we experience today the second largest Mexican electoral politics, the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), is a tragedy that should plunging into mourning Mexican liberals and Democrats, to all those in the trenches of the old left and the center gave progressive soul, mind and heart for the Mexican political geometry left open and thus break the bipartisanship of the PRI and PAN.

As everyone knows, after the scandalous electoral fraud orchestrated almost 20 years ago the government of Miguel de la Madrid and a group of PRI that did everything to prevent the president came to power Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas, candidate of the then National Democratic Front ( NDF)-between the fraudsters were the Manuel, Camacho and Bartlett, today two of the men closest to Andrés Manuel López Obrador, it seemed that finally the Mexican left had taken the right course.

words, due to electoral fraud in the 1988, the NDF became a solid game that began with the founding slogan "support the democratic transition", and so his name Democratic Revolution Party "and" to oust the PRI from Los Pinos. " Thus, in the middle of a crossroads on the one hand encouraging omens proposed, and the other founders faced an authoritarian and criminal prosecution initiated by the government of Carlos Salinas, whose operators were precisely the manuel and characters such as Arturo Núñez in 1989 was born the PRD, the party whiteYellow, the Aztec sun and today, to wear regrettable, is decried as the party only yellow.

Well, that party who was born 19 years ago with the slogan "support the democratic revolution" and "to oust the PRI from Los Pinos, today is a caricature of its founding principles and not only returned to the most ancient and undemocratic practices that characterized the PRI, but in processes such as we will see throughout the day, seems to love who was abducted from their colonizers, the ideologues of the old PRI, the party they said fight.

In short, the PRD is now not only denies the basic concepts of democratic development, and to say nothing of the democratic revolution, "but lives regression in terms of the evolution of species would be to renege on Charles Darwin, while in emotional terms, is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome is not the phenomenon that leads to the infatuation of the abductor. And yes, in this case, the PRD became enamored with the PRI, its culture and practices. And in this logic, the PRD as the party was colonized, kidnapped by the worst of men and the practices of the PRI.

Since 2000 we warned in this space that dangerous regression and colonization unstoppable, we said that this vortex is committing a "political parricide" in which the favorite son, Andrew Manuel López Obrador, politically assassinate his father, Cuauhtemoc Cardenas, to take power. We said that the new PRD and its new leadership was not only a regression to the older coarse PRI, or perhaps the fourth stage of the PRI and the PRD were obvious symptoms of a condition known as Stockholm syndrome. All preferred to unleash the "piñata of power"-because in a naive way they thought they had power in the bag, while the response to critics was the insult, disqualification, threats and even defamation.

faith traps But

all those years, the stubborn reality set. The intrigue of this supposedly left bowed to the weight and force of a reality in which many believed, but never found a real foothold and sustainable "because the stage was built only to gain power and never to promote a project ideological and partisan, "and ultimately ended up shaping a tidal wave of disappointment, dissatisfaction and disappointment.

The millions who believed that collective delusion that was dressed in the garb of the left and the PRD, which presented as a savior of the country to its presidential candidate Lopez Obrador and his alternative government, eventually becoming unstoppable social mass, not their ability to organize, protest and less by the rapid reaction of their antibodies, but by his inexhaustible reserves of hatred, resentment and frustration against any and all who were not with Mr. legitimate or in favor of their occurrences.

So, not being with the legitimate dissent of his delusions, questioning its absurdities, was and is synonymous with treason. This deformation-true democratic regression to Stalinist and fascist attitudes "expressed not only against legitimate critics, against their natural enemies, but against their own opponents within the PRD. Thus, anyone who does not shared ideas, nonsense and delusions of legítmo was a traitor who should be burned green wood, whether or not militant, leader of the PRD and even aspiring to a position of representation.

why we must insist on the question: is it really sensible that anyone can argue that it is now the PRD can be identified as a leftist? Yes, there are. And among those who argue that the PRD is the best representation of the left that Mexico has had located some of the most renowned Mexican intellectuals, those who in times of questioning the hegemony of the PRI PRI, but coincidentally were paid from the coffers of governments PRI; those who patented and legitimized the offensive nickname of "stick with the left and the right to charge."

No matter who wins

At least until the evening of today, few know the results of the election on Sunday, although at least three polling firms conducted surveys on the fight for the presidency PRD. But in fact, not necessary that you know if the majority of votes will take Jesus Ortega and Alejandro Encinas. And is that what is clear is that neither can tell who is the party president in Mexico is to the left.

And today no one can deny the obvious. Well, almost anyone except the fans and lovers forever. And it is evident that with everything and yet, the PRD insists on walking in the opposite direction to the basics of a political force that is claimed to left. On other occasions we asked here if anyone seriously believes that everything we've seen the PRD in everyday political practice and its special events, such as the renewal of its national leadership, some people may argue that the yellows are a leftist party.

And we must confess that the reactions to that question have left us dumbfounded. Yes, there are those who defend and justify to Mr. René Bejarano and Gerardo Fernandez Noronha, who say that Manuel Camacho, Manuel Bartlett, Marcelo Ebrard, are something like heroes of the left, and even those who say that the naive teacher Bernardo Batiz and electoral offenders as Arturo Núñez and José Guadarrama, are examples of doctrinal consistency and partisan.

And if that is a trend that dominates intramural PRD, we can understand the reasons why that party is the worst of its crisis of identity. And, in fact, by now no matter who the two candidates could be the winner. The important thing is that the two sides does not seek recovery of the party, do not try to rescue the founding ideology and objectives that gave life to that political force, especially a left-wing concept. What matters is power. And is that whoever wins the election today, you can take control of the party line for the elections of 2009 and 2012. And that's no small thing.


traps
And of course there will be many who refuse to acknowledge that the yellows have become the worst of the PRI. But we might ask, to dispel doubts: Does anyone remember an internal election of any registered political parties, which have been dirtier, more challenged, more illegal? What face political quality, morality or ethics, Lords of the PRD, as the rightful leaders can challenge the federal elections? If we review the internal processes of the PRI, PAN or any other of the registered political forces, we will see any conducts its internal processes such filth, as we have seen in the PRD.

That what traps. Well, the list is endless. Some pearls. Everyone knows that funded from somewhere, across the country appeared a letter signed by AMLO, which asks the million members to vote for Encinas yellow. "Quen pump? This is illegal. Sure. But guess what? Yes, that AMLO won as the arbiter of election Mr. Arturo Nunez. "Who is? Well, nothing more and nothing less than the man of Manlio Fabio Beltrones, in the government of Carlos Salinas, to pursue the PRD. What? Chulada of consistency. Perhaps

PRD know where did the money for all this campaign? Many do not know, but as many as they sense. Who are the main political support in Mexico City, Alejandro Encinas? Yes, Mr. René Bejarano, Marti Batres and, of course, Mrs. Alejandra Barrales, the last candidate to lead the capital's PRD. Well, if we review those names, you know where to get the money. Or not? But

everything is in the City. Come to another entity, for example, Zacatecas, where the governor Amalia García, along with her daughter's, Sen. Claudia Corichi, are in the eye of the hurricane. Why? It turns out that public money for Alejandro Encinas out with both hands via the local DIF, which is in the hands of "the daughter uncomfortable." Yes, she has more than two positions: Senator, President of DIF, the daughter of the governor and frontrunner to state government. Another girl of democratic example in the style of the Mexican left.

Well, what we saw yesterday, when the candidate Alejandro Encinas reported that he came in anonymously to his tent a thousand ballots for the election today. And indeed, it was real ballots, according to the officials, came illegally. What is it? As a ploy intended to advance what we all know, but do not want to say in public. That

as in the federal election, Mr legitimate partners do not recognize the outcome of the election, of course, if they lose, and everything seems to happen, "and declared that there was fraud. And that statement was made after ballots yesterday showed Encinas. Those ballots will be proof of fraud, according to the strategy and its Encinas Chief Lopez Obrador. That is, a legitimate candidate and his associates, "are putting the bandage before the court." And that will be his alibi.

Fraud, false government

And if tonight or no later than Monday morning, polls and official results give victory to the candidate Jesus Ortega, then Mr. Alejandro Encinas and its partners declare that there was fraud, that Jesus Ortega's presidency is illegitimate, the more Chucho is illegitimate, and is likely to propose a sit-in protest, while one could claim head of Arturo Núñez, by then considered the modern Luis Carlos Ugalde.

We will see in the PRD primary election of a decal of what we saw in July 2006, where everything was fine until Mr. legitimate was defeated. Then came the ghosts of the anti-democracy of the PRD. All is well if I win, but everything is very bad if they lose. And if I win, we live in the realm of democracy, if I miss living in hell, and all are the worst, the institutions, the party itself will go to hell. And from what happened yesterday, it is likely that the winner was Jesus Ortega. Faced with this hypothesis, "AMLO recognize their defeat? That's the big question. Time.

Sending Books Overseas Best Method

and want to make it obvious need. Florestan.

Since before Andrés Manuel López Obrador formally launched his presidential campaign in 2005, a group of hard, led by Victor Hernandez, contributed to the ePolicy to create the path of Peje, place of worship and propaganda tool knock, disqualification, slander and defamation, a tool to intimidate and insult.

On the trail could be all that was supporting their candidate, and from there came the worst attacks on their opponents who thought no, but their enemies, branded with the worst adjectives, the most reiterated the traitor and sold.

The blog was an unprecedented success and became a reference. No other candidate had the cyberspace, not to the effectiveness and impact.

tone, already intolerable, increased its decibel to reach new levels as he approached the date of the presidential election on July 2, 2006, and exceeded all rational limits post-election conflict, which was exacerbated exacerbated the already political and social climate.

Peje was the path and, therefore, was untouchable, which said there had nothing to do with truth or with reality, only the impulses of his inspiration and guidance. Both of them, El Peje and the trail became indestructible. The tone of the blog was hardened to the extent that his guide was hardening, and then coming to least to the extent that his guide was weakening.

Thus, El Peje trail began to eat his inspiration and be harder than him, to the point of pass and run against a section of the PRD has drawn a line with former presidential candidate.

The Sunday after the rally at the Pemex tower when AMLO silenced those not allowed to talk to Deputy Javier Gonzalez Garza, and separated from violence against Sen. Carlos Navarrete, the blog of Peje rebelled and went on against "the downgrading of the people's demands."

"We are not sheep, Andrés Manuel. We have broken the mother to support this movement, and will not admit that we pay for demanding the first who should be with this movement, the deputies and senators of the PRD, in their attitudes and lackey sissies. "

were identified in the path PRD lawmakers who rushed to the PGR to raise a complaint, now, by threats, slander and defamation, and require the blocking of the site.

For that I liked, so delicate and cowardly. For months, from this blog, is reviled and slandered, threatened that hundreds of citizens them, by their silence, endorsed. Today, that touch, ask him silenced.

Moreover, the path is like the scorpion's attack in nature. Even at his inspiration.

See you on Tuesday, but in private.

Joaquín López-Doriga - 118

Big Boobs Above 60 Years

The Road Show provided López Obrador

AMLO and the journalistic interview

Andrés Manuel López Obrador has begun what appears to be a long media road show to try to manage according to political expediency and could give it presence in radio, television and press for several weeks. Then sending letters to different media in order to grant it space, AMLO announced on Monday the list of those who responded positively to his request. In addition to what you say López Obrador, his interventions in the media will be interesting because we will know the design, both theoretical and practical, than about the interview as a journalistic genre are professionals who receive the politician Tabasco in their spaces. Whitelist



These are, in the words of former presidential candidate, the media agreed to interview:

"From the press told us Elena Gallegos of The Day ..., René Delgado, Reform, and Mario Menendez's Por Esto! of the Yucatan Peninsula. Radio programs Zabludovsky James told us, in Radio Centre, Omar Sanchez de Tagle, and Daniel Moreno, W Radio, Enrique Hernández Alcázar, the program The Weso, W Radio, Sergio Gutierrez, ABC Radio, Francisco Zea, the Group Image and Ciro Gomez Leyva, Radio Formula.

"Also Joaquin Lopez Doriga, Radio Formula, Carlos Loret de Mola, Radio Formula, Jorge Santa Cruz, Radio 13, Teodoro Renteria, Radio and TeleFórmula, Martin Moreno, Report 98.5, Sergio Sarmiento, Radio Center , and Sergio Castaneda, Radiorama Morelos ... We also spoke Eduardo Ruiz Healy, Radio Formula, Abraham Zabludovsky, Radio 13, and Eduardo Pasquel, Capital Radio. TV, Katia D'Artigues, TV Azteca. "

A list must be added to MILLENNIUM, whose director, Carlos Marin, responded publicly on Wednesday AMLO's letter indicating that "the doors are open to say what they want and what we are asked, or for an interview. " Twenty Interviews



media expressed willingness to interview Lopez Obrador are four newspapers, 16 radio news and a television. Among the groups radio, Radio Formula tops the list of invitations to five different newscasts, followed by Radio Centro, Group Picture, Radio W Radio 13 and, with two tickets each, and ABC Radio, Radiorama and Capital Radio, with each is. Lacking, among others, Acir, Radio Mil, Televisa, who therefore could enter a "blacklist", although López Obrador said, in the case of Televisa, its confidence that "we will grant the time."

The Tabasco did not mention the dates or the order in which they will interview. Probably try to manage those areas as appropriate media his political strategy. However, to be seen whether those who already hold the invitation offered to interview him in case they are placed in the last places in the row or AMLO told to talk to them within two months. Until yesterday morning, Lopez Obrador had appeared in three interviews: one in Morelos Radiorama held on February 8, another to James Zabludovsky, 11, and a more in Weso, Wednesday 13.

A López Obrador has been criticized because it allegedly prefers interviews "mode, without question stronger, which can make long harangues. Such was the conversation with Zabludovsky, who in 45 minutes 40 seconds that the interview lasted only asked three questions. López Obrador spoke without interruption in an initial block of 25 minutes, then another ten and two late 3 minutes each. However, in, The Weso where he faced a panel of eight people showed up to respond to short presentations, but sometimes struggled with the interviewers when the politician willing to hold forth at length and they are not allowed. Even showed a sense of humor and adapted quickly to the jocular tone of the program. Media Luz



In journalistic practice there are basically three concepts related to the interview as a genre. In one argues that the respondent should be the main character who speaks to him is to direct the conversation to topics of general interest in which the character has something to say (for that you go to it.) Another sees the interview as a contest of intelligence and verbal fencing between the journalist and the character. Another style is considered to be "aggressive" with the interviewee to "get" opinions or statements would not do in a lecture "loving."

'll see what the style these days who interviewed Lopez Obrador, who seems to have found a new formula to come to light after media failure suffered by your program in TV Azteca that, both literally and metaphorically, he spent the night.

Fernando Mejía Barquera - 76

Lose Of Verginity Vid

For

Even in my most vicious nightmares would I have imagined that at this point in 2008, the main protagonist of the media would be Andrés Manuel López Obrador.

Why? Because it is assumed that Mr. lost the election year and a half ago, and when a candidate loses, do not go away, at least no longer of interest to the press, radio and television. Don Andrés Manuel

not, he is still a matter of debate, who sets the agenda and who gives such notice and as we have been observing in recent days.

Like you, I've seen, heard and read how many journalists, some of the most famous of the country, refer to El Peje with contempt, hate, irony, anger and resentment.

And yes, much contempt, so much hate, irony, anger and resentment but ultimately the only ones being bad are they for Mr. López Obrador may seem that these journalists want, like and send, but still the great emotional leader of our nation.

is also very smart because it moves as the best performing legends of the past 100 years.

Don Andrés Manuel does not agree to be interviewed when the media want to interview, he decides who will ask, on what topics, when and where.

And journalists are offended, and angry, and declare that no information blockade, offer their spaces, and almost, almost, put their orders.

Is not it amazing? I wonder how many people from politics, culture, sports and entertainment can give Mexican luxuries given Mr. López Obrador.

Not only that, how many can do away with it coming out, falling well to certain sectors of the population and following up in the list of sources consulted. Because

Andrés Manuel López Obrador is like Carmen Salinas, you can talk about whatever he wants and is always news. Always.

What happens here? Why Mr. López Obrador has such a presence? Why has so much power? Why sell? Because it is not true, is a fantasy.

Since losing the election, Andrés Manuel López Obrador no longer a man of flesh and bone to become a symbolic representation of the huge frustrations that we Mexicans.

one hand, some people don Andrés Manuel takes the perspective of defeat of injustice and suffering, and feels that he identifies with him, which is like him.

and follows up on each of their statements because they are the things you say, wise or foolish, but a product of all that anger, discrimination and loss.

other hand there are people who take Mr. López Obrador from the perspective of superiority, rejection and intolerance, and feel they are different from him, better than him.

and follow through with each of his statements to refute them, because they are the things you never say, wise or foolish, but also the product of the anger of another rage, and discrimination, another form of discrimination, and defeat, another style of defeat.

The key to the success of Andrés Manuel López Obrador as a social phenomenon that always confronts us with our deepest wounds, angry and upset because we know that those wounds will never close.

worst that could happen to this first major of the Mexican character of the new millennium is to succeed. Pedro Infante would be as if he had not died, as if Maria Felix had not been a diva. Would be the end of myth.

How long will take the role of Andrés Manuel López Obrador in our society? Until we make a mistake like Subcomandante Marcos, until Election 2012 or until another character does not arise with the same weight in our popular culture.

But who? Felipe Calderón does not exist in terms of legend, no one has bothered to invent, is perceived gray, tiny and his collaborators, rather than marry the collective imagination, appear on the covers of magazines social making them instantly into enemies of people.

Who knows what will happen in this country in the coming years, but who already bought tickets for posterity is Andrés Manuel López Obrador, as Colosio, as Clouthier. Do not tell me no? Álvaro Cueva

Driver For Sound Blaster Ct4870

Ruth's head

Ah, how life goes ... Florestan

PRD lawmaker Ruth Zavaleta, has become a target for groups related to Lopez Obrador, including this one.

The Speaker of the House of Representatives has seen the worst attacks against the most vile insults, come of their own.

And so was the case of Gerardo Fernandez Norona, who accused her of having "loose body", which led to the board of the PRD to a benevolent exile, leaving his party colleague, supporting the downgrading of the most active operator Lee Urban Obrador.

Then came the attack in unison, with the same handwriting, and operate them, the peje-blogs, where mercilessly vilified and viciously, and one former candidate team, or their women, in contrast, drew face for Ruth.

This scenario would give Lopez Obrador's statement, accusing her of having allowed the legs to play politically in the visit he made Juan Camilo Mourino as interior minister, prompting the response from the deputy, who from the disappointment of he said, thought it was a statesman, he proved to be a barroom bully.

next day said its reference to the legs was not addressed to the deputy Zavaleta but, he said, Mouriño and Calderon, the couple, which had already been denied by its advocates who, like Fernández Noronha, justified it by saying that men speak well, which thus express all that women can not stand anything that was not misogyny, and that the Congress president would last one year, the council three and a lifetime of shame.

Following up on this offense AMLO hard this week, the deputy Bejarano, his party colleague and bench, Valentina Batres, demanded the resignation to the Chair of the Board of the Chamber of Deputies eleven reasons ranging from the inauguration of President Calderon on December 1, 2000, until a recent encounter with Mouriño. After this onslaught

reveals the essence of the offensive against him: he dared to address the legitimate president, which does not spare his followers.

This Zavaleta said to make the formal request and that she did not lose any sleep.

Actually, what we are seeing is a split where one party is López Obrador, and the other New Left (NI), that the shock is part of the struggle for control of the PRD in the process of relay its leadership in facing the same groups, and make clear the message Internal far they are willing to come to his defense.

But also send one to the company: If you disqualify each other, insult and aggravate such violence, what is left for those who do not agree with them.

See you tomorrow, but in private.

Joaquín López-Doriga - 118