Reasons Jorge Fernández Menéndez
15-Apr-2008
Eighty-five percent of the population rejects the actions taken by the PRD to "close" (as I have tried always, all the coup) the Congress, as Surveys released in the last hours. To strengthen this impression, the PRD and Lopez Obrador leaders have decided, at least as I write these lines, strengthen your position and insist that they leave the stands if there is a debate in the format, time and even components they want, which should extend at least until August, with the aim of which is crimping the Union address, while maintaining the country paralyzed for more than four months.
When your enemy is wrong, say those who know, should not distract. And López Obrador is wrong with this action as well as with the famous sit-in 2006: no social support, there is a positive impact on the resources (Lopez complained after two months had more coverage than anyone in the political world , that the media have criticized what did you expect?, does Tejero received many compliments when he took at gunpoint English Courts to try to curb the democratic transition?) have unified the other party against and have exposed the internal fractures in the PRD. People have been very bad so far and Lopez can not understand that the rest of the country, their decisions seem esoteric and have no followers. Somehow looking out the problem and said on Sunday: there is a new "complementary", it is media and includes the Supreme Court (is it because you still have open criminal proceedings or for the election of the PRD will end in the Electoral Tribunal? ) and to lift the footage, you must do exactly what it says and try to impose party that has a little less than a third of Congress.
The temptation then is to send as the devil as they send the institutions, as again López repeat on Sunday. It would be wrong. In part this is what these characters want: the use of law enforcement by the federal government. And as you know it is difficult to apply on a group of louts with trade, blackmail that the only way to be endless dialogue proposed. You really have to look at measures that are beyond these two options for further work, if a PRD sector better, if the Stockholm syndrome make it impossible, no way. The police should be and attempts to contain more violent footage of the venues. At the weekend, the idea that they who lead this movement is that calls to take the rooms adelitas session on especially in the Senate. The small detail is that they have no immunity and that can not afford. These groups are small but defiant, somehow must maintain control of the process in a city like Mexico, which guarantees the rights of citizens when to take action against the infantry of his political boss. There they were on Sunday in an act intended to ignore the country's institutions and support measures that violate the law, the Secretary of Government, Social Development and Public Security Secretary capital.
But the issue is the debate: on Thursday, when they took the stands, and was holding Carlos Navarrete agreement to a debate of three weeks, more enough in the case of a subject that has been discussed ad nauseum for years, in order to analyze the sector and enterprise. Even with that the PRD would have prevented the approval of the initiatives during this regular session. Now proposes a 50-day debate and it appears that the FAP also rejected. The choice should be clear: the PRD accepts the proposal or losing it. Because you can move in other ways: for example, what better than a query without limits?, What would happen if Congress opens tomorrow, an internet site for all institutions, all specialists, all citizens who have proposals to do in the matter, to be presented? A space that is open access to review, read, rate. What if the Energy Commission, with a functional advisory committee, appointed by two-thirds of its members, reviews all such proposals in three weeks and then, based on them, make modifications or additions are necessary?, " What would be more universal, more comprehensive, more democratic than a query like this?
At the same time should follow the legislative agenda: the Chamber of Deputies are initiatives of all kinds (about 40) offer a great variety of subjects from secondary education to the appointment of the Comptroller of the IFE. One option may be the alternate sites, but would be otherwise: to make the platform do not need dozens, that some hooligans with rushes jurisdiction over them is enough. Should be legislated in Congress, but sometimes forgets that it is not necessarily in full and these initiatives need only a simple majority for approval: are you prepared all FAP lawmakers not to intervene in these debates and Production of these laws? Ultimately have to take responsibility, are subordinated to what she said Lopez or make their respective decisions.
If the PRD does not want to discuss, do not do it, unless you want to participate in the legislative process, which lies outside, if your officials and leaders believe that one day may be unaware of the institutions and the next day to ask from resources and political support, someone needs to remind them of their contradiction. The continuing wrong and away from people, but someone is responsible for making them pay the bill. In politics nothing is free.
15-Apr-2008
Eighty-five percent of the population rejects the actions taken by the PRD to "close" (as I have tried always, all the coup) the Congress, as Surveys released in the last hours. To strengthen this impression, the PRD and Lopez Obrador leaders have decided, at least as I write these lines, strengthen your position and insist that they leave the stands if there is a debate in the format, time and even components they want, which should extend at least until August, with the aim of which is crimping the Union address, while maintaining the country paralyzed for more than four months.
When your enemy is wrong, say those who know, should not distract. And López Obrador is wrong with this action as well as with the famous sit-in 2006: no social support, there is a positive impact on the resources (Lopez complained after two months had more coverage than anyone in the political world , that the media have criticized what did you expect?, does Tejero received many compliments when he took at gunpoint English Courts to try to curb the democratic transition?) have unified the other party against and have exposed the internal fractures in the PRD. People have been very bad so far and Lopez can not understand that the rest of the country, their decisions seem esoteric and have no followers. Somehow looking out the problem and said on Sunday: there is a new "complementary", it is media and includes the Supreme Court (is it because you still have open criminal proceedings or for the election of the PRD will end in the Electoral Tribunal? ) and to lift the footage, you must do exactly what it says and try to impose party that has a little less than a third of Congress.
The temptation then is to send as the devil as they send the institutions, as again López repeat on Sunday. It would be wrong. In part this is what these characters want: the use of law enforcement by the federal government. And as you know it is difficult to apply on a group of louts with trade, blackmail that the only way to be endless dialogue proposed. You really have to look at measures that are beyond these two options for further work, if a PRD sector better, if the Stockholm syndrome make it impossible, no way. The police should be and attempts to contain more violent footage of the venues. At the weekend, the idea that they who lead this movement is that calls to take the rooms adelitas session on especially in the Senate. The small detail is that they have no immunity and that can not afford. These groups are small but defiant, somehow must maintain control of the process in a city like Mexico, which guarantees the rights of citizens when to take action against the infantry of his political boss. There they were on Sunday in an act intended to ignore the country's institutions and support measures that violate the law, the Secretary of Government, Social Development and Public Security Secretary capital.
But the issue is the debate: on Thursday, when they took the stands, and was holding Carlos Navarrete agreement to a debate of three weeks, more enough in the case of a subject that has been discussed ad nauseum for years, in order to analyze the sector and enterprise. Even with that the PRD would have prevented the approval of the initiatives during this regular session. Now proposes a 50-day debate and it appears that the FAP also rejected. The choice should be clear: the PRD accepts the proposal or losing it. Because you can move in other ways: for example, what better than a query without limits?, What would happen if Congress opens tomorrow, an internet site for all institutions, all specialists, all citizens who have proposals to do in the matter, to be presented? A space that is open access to review, read, rate. What if the Energy Commission, with a functional advisory committee, appointed by two-thirds of its members, reviews all such proposals in three weeks and then, based on them, make modifications or additions are necessary?, " What would be more universal, more comprehensive, more democratic than a query like this?
At the same time should follow the legislative agenda: the Chamber of Deputies are initiatives of all kinds (about 40) offer a great variety of subjects from secondary education to the appointment of the Comptroller of the IFE. One option may be the alternate sites, but would be otherwise: to make the platform do not need dozens, that some hooligans with rushes jurisdiction over them is enough. Should be legislated in Congress, but sometimes forgets that it is not necessarily in full and these initiatives need only a simple majority for approval: are you prepared all FAP lawmakers not to intervene in these debates and Production of these laws? Ultimately have to take responsibility, are subordinated to what she said Lopez or make their respective decisions.
If the PRD does not want to discuss, do not do it, unless you want to participate in the legislative process, which lies outside, if your officials and leaders believe that one day may be unaware of the institutions and the next day to ask from resources and political support, someone needs to remind them of their contradiction. The continuing wrong and away from people, but someone is responsible for making them pay the bill. In politics nothing is free.
0 comments:
Post a Comment