Make Shoes White Again

For Carmen Aristegui F.

Not even three weeks to develop mid-term election day on July 5 in the country, the Electoral Tribunal of the Judiciary of the Federation issued a controversial ruling that not only threatens the peace of the elections in the largest river in the capital, but has placed the verge of a formal split the Democratic Revolution Party and its presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Iztapalapa has been the main arena of the dispute between the groups in the PRD. In the most populated of the delegations is settled the supremacy of one of the two main currents in the country and left it at issue also if there is room or not, both within the country's third political force.

The gibberish caused by the Court, with a final decision, has put on a war footing in a confrontation that is not so serious compared with you may have with any other party or adversary out there. The resolution has not done more to push the cliff at this party, moreover, has walked on the edge of this from a long time. The question that is if the highest electoral court of justice did what he did in a deliberate attempt to harm some and favor others at a key moment and definitions. If so, as many assume, with political calculation and with a desire to define the dispute over judicial reasons, through a failure of dubious legal consistency, we would quite simply to an event of incalculable proportions. It

ask whether the Court , Which is considered part of the "mafia that rules this country," according to López Obrador, found here an opportunity to precipitate certain and crushing the weak castle which held its acronym PRD members. Who are part of this Court have been attacked, abused and vilified constantly López Obrador and the current that accompanies it. Should not have to have sympathy for the former presidential candidate. There's no doubt, but then that by that or other reasons have decided to intervene and modify the ruling of the Federal District Electoral Tribunal which gave victory to Clara Brugada and knock him the nomination-with predictable consequences we are seeing in these days, there should be a great distance.

If indeed we are facing an undue interference of the Court and even perverse, that alone would make this body a local college unworthy of the great responsibility vested in it. Would be faced with one more link in the drama of national policy now embodied by the highest court. If the justices spoke with ill intentions to derail what was left of the balances in the PRD, they are succeeding. Unexpected measures, which have been losing the nomination in this enclave have sent signals that cause enormous confusion. It has created a mess that it is impossible to know how stop this choice and levels of engagement that trigger.

A desperate way to recover the lost ship was the one that came up-the-fly-López Obrador during a rally Tuesday in Iztapalapa. In a speech instructed outrageous, settled nominations and was passed from euphoria to awe the crowd had heard of puns for those who would spend to get Brugada finally comes to the delegation. Without consultation, he assumed that Marcelo Ebrard sent to the Assembly's proposal to replace Brugada anointed candidate, the PT, to take the post office once you have achieved a victory that he would not, but the movement and defunct candidate that would be present at the election through what some have called with a candidate surrogate humor. López Obrador

showed a spirit inappropriate to be exceeded and caused rejoicing among his detractors. The judges, meanwhile, feel and weight of the criticism. In Wednesday's session one, Flavio Galvan, had to enunciate, to deny the main allegations: "... corrupt judges, judges sold, partisan judges, influenced by politics." In this story, everyone will have to take care of what you do and what he says. So the rally is to heat or heat from a judicial decision. In Iztapalapa, for now, it has been already become a tinderbox.