Denise Maerker
June 19, 2009
"The defeat he changed or only exacerbated the worst part?
Does Andrés Manuel we saw on Tuesday is Iztapalapa same as achieved that 15 million Mexicans elected him in 2006? Is that hard-faced man, defiant and arrogant is the strategy that won a million in campaign years? I could not stop myself these questions while watching images and reveía Iztapalapa rally. Are we deceived or is it another? "The defeat he changed or only exacerbated the worst part?
But what we saw? Input, gesture, challenging and full. While sharing his great plan to circumvent the decision of the Electoral Tribunal, Andrés Manuel looked euphoric, seemed to say that he will not be the one, and that if something is put on the road, he always finds a way to give back. And since he is, whether the output is bizarre and undemocratic, is valid because it is yours. It's that simple. Then, the tone humiliating.
Juanito humiliated needlessly. "Because he was not going to believe," he said, noting the candidate of the PT derogatory. "He knows that if he wins it for us. Marcelo Ebrard also humbled to publicly give orders. Humiliated the local deputies have been elected without and were instructed how to vote. And the voters who are uncertain whether to go or not go to the polls, should have received the message: do not bother, everything is resolved without their participation.
Did we have evidence that Lopez Obrador was so? I would say no, but the truth is that yes, traits that undoubtedly the defeat has deepened, his contempt for those who have gone against insecurity, his "shut up, chachalaca" with his tolerance, intolerance of others, their decision not to go to the first debate, polls invented. I did not give their importance and it is my duty to accept it publicly, but others did. I do not mean of course to his eternal visceral opponents or enemies. Gabriel Zaid, a week before the election, wrote: "Do not vote for López Obrador, a charismatic because it is believed to be indestructible, with all the dangers of reckless driving ego." I saw Enrique Krause who wrote the article The tropical messiah. Federico Reyes Heroles saw him.
I still think that Lopez Obrador understands a Mexico that others do not see that his diagnosis of the country and its evils was the best. But How wrong I was when in third grade, a few days before the election, the question of whether Lopez Obrador would accept a defeat, I said yes!
0 comments:
Post a Comment