Make Shoes White Again

For Carmen Aristegui F.

Not even three weeks to develop mid-term election day on July 5 in the country, the Electoral Tribunal of the Judiciary of the Federation issued a controversial ruling that not only threatens the peace of the elections in the largest river in the capital, but has placed the verge of a formal split the Democratic Revolution Party and its presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Iztapalapa has been the main arena of the dispute between the groups in the PRD. In the most populated of the delegations is settled the supremacy of one of the two main currents in the country and left it at issue also if there is room or not, both within the country's third political force.

The gibberish caused by the Court, with a final decision, has put on a war footing in a confrontation that is not so serious compared with you may have with any other party or adversary out there. The resolution has not done more to push the cliff at this party, moreover, has walked on the edge of this from a long time. The question that is if the highest electoral court of justice did what he did in a deliberate attempt to harm some and favor others at a key moment and definitions. If so, as many assume, with political calculation and with a desire to define the dispute over judicial reasons, through a failure of dubious legal consistency, we would quite simply to an event of incalculable proportions. It

ask whether the Court , Which is considered part of the "mafia that rules this country," according to López Obrador, found here an opportunity to precipitate certain and crushing the weak castle which held its acronym PRD members. Who are part of this Court have been attacked, abused and vilified constantly López Obrador and the current that accompanies it. Should not have to have sympathy for the former presidential candidate. There's no doubt, but then that by that or other reasons have decided to intervene and modify the ruling of the Federal District Electoral Tribunal which gave victory to Clara Brugada and knock him the nomination-with predictable consequences we are seeing in these days, there should be a great distance.

If indeed we are facing an undue interference of the Court and even perverse, that alone would make this body a local college unworthy of the great responsibility vested in it. Would be faced with one more link in the drama of national policy now embodied by the highest court. If the justices spoke with ill intentions to derail what was left of the balances in the PRD, they are succeeding. Unexpected measures, which have been losing the nomination in this enclave have sent signals that cause enormous confusion. It has created a mess that it is impossible to know how stop this choice and levels of engagement that trigger.

A desperate way to recover the lost ship was the one that came up-the-fly-López Obrador during a rally Tuesday in Iztapalapa. In a speech instructed outrageous, settled nominations and was passed from euphoria to awe the crowd had heard of puns for those who would spend to get Brugada finally comes to the delegation. Without consultation, he assumed that Marcelo Ebrard sent to the Assembly's proposal to replace Brugada anointed candidate, the PT, to take the post office once you have achieved a victory that he would not, but the movement and defunct candidate that would be present at the election through what some have called with a candidate surrogate humor. López Obrador

showed a spirit inappropriate to be exceeded and caused rejoicing among his detractors. The judges, meanwhile, feel and weight of the criticism. In Wednesday's session one, Flavio Galvan, had to enunciate, to deny the main allegations: "... corrupt judges, judges sold, partisan judges, influenced by politics." In this story, everyone will have to take care of what you do and what he says. So the rally is to heat or heat from a judicial decision. In Iztapalapa, for now, it has been already become a tinderbox.

Best Teasing Hair Spray

AMLO Andrés Manuel


Denise Maerker

Shipping News

June 19, 2009

"The defeat he changed or only exacerbated the worst part?

Does Andrés Manuel we saw on Tuesday is Iztapalapa same as achieved that 15 million Mexicans elected him in 2006? Is that hard-faced man, defiant and arrogant is the strategy that won a million in campaign years? I could not stop myself these questions while watching images and reveía Iztapalapa rally. Are we deceived or is it another? "The defeat he changed or only exacerbated the worst part?

But what we saw? Input, gesture, challenging and full. While sharing his great plan to circumvent the decision of the Electoral Tribunal, Andrés Manuel looked euphoric, seemed to say that he will not be the one, and that if something is put on the road, he always finds a way to give back. And since he is, whether the output is bizarre and undemocratic, is valid because it is yours. It's that simple. Then, the tone humiliating.

Juanito humiliated needlessly. "Because he was not going to believe," he said, noting the candidate of the PT derogatory. "He knows that if he wins it for us. Marcelo Ebrard also humbled to publicly give orders. Humiliated the local deputies have been elected without and were instructed how to vote. And the voters who are uncertain whether to go or not go to the polls, should have received the message: do not bother, everything is resolved without their participation.

Did we have evidence that Lopez Obrador was so? I would say no, but the truth is that yes, traits that undoubtedly the defeat has deepened, his contempt for those who have gone against insecurity, his "shut up, chachalaca" with his tolerance, intolerance of others, their decision not to go to the first debate, polls invented. I did not give their importance and it is my duty to accept it publicly, but others did. I do not mean of course to his eternal visceral opponents or enemies. Gabriel Zaid, a week before the election, wrote: "Do not vote for López Obrador, a charismatic because it is believed to be indestructible, with all the dangers of reckless driving ego." I saw Enrique Krause who wrote the article The tropical messiah. Federico Reyes Heroles saw him.

I still think that Lopez Obrador understands a Mexico that others do not see that his diagnosis of the country and its evils was the best. But How wrong I was when in third grade, a few days before the election, the question of whether Lopez Obrador would accept a defeat, I said yes!