Thursday, November 19, 2009
Monday, November 16, 2009
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Monday, November 2, 2009
Persasive Essay About Breast Cancer
impunity and audacity
Jorge Fernández Menéndez Reasons
29-Oct-2009
Something is wrong in our matches, particularly on the left: Martin Esparza, in the conflict the disappearance of Luz y Fuerza del Centro, is busy remodeling his ranch in Hidalgo, where he raises horses Creoles. Andres Jr., the son of López Obrador, boasting of his tennis thousand dollar Louis Vuitton, its yacht trips New York, their friends and entertainment on Facebook and Twitter, also reached there to criticize the newspapers and party leaders in which his father supposedly military. The buildings that manages and builds René Bejarano people should be evicted because they are about to fall, but the illustrious René can afford to give away groceries to EMS, to be in public events with Flavio Sosa and Esparza and indulge of increasing weight in the López Obrador. Claudia Sheinbaum is inaugurating houses, in fact, operational branches of the same movement, and will go 46 more. Adam Lopez, one lout who threw a counterfeit Javier Lozano's face, tells the journalist Rubén Cortés, has a long history of political grasshopper has allowed in nine years, be Madraco, Fox and Lopez Obrador, a whole show of political coherence. And one can not but wonder where does all that money, that contempt even by the most elementary forms of law and policy.
large extent is impunity. Tomorrow, the IFE will officially unveil the opinion by which it relieves the PRD have received money from businessman Carlos Ahumada in the 2003 elections as a result of an investigation over five years, after complaints from PRI and PAN, by the famous video showing the then officials and party leaders, René Bejarano and Carlos Imaz, among others, taking hundreds of thousands of dollars from Ahumada offices. Has never known what Bejarano and Imaz did with the money and the authorities have been so strict in prosecuting the businessman who claimed to be blackmailed by these characters, who have not had time or desire to find out.
But even after five years, so has the IFE. The explanation given by the Electoral Institute for waiving the case to the PRD is absurd, although they have spent nearly 400 pages to develop: they say that the dates on which Ahumada claimed some contracts in the Mexico City government do not coincide with the dates they gave that money to Bejarano and Imaz, therefore, that money could not go to the game, as if the contract payment was the only source of income that had Ahumada. Indeed, this promise, in an interview he did in May, have given about 200 million pesos to this party, besides having paid, among other things, including to trips to Europe of some of its leaders, the debt I had the PRD campaign Televisa 2003. Was it so difficult to know who paid and by what means that debt? Apparently so, because the IFE decided that it was not a crime. The truth is that with less than that built the case Pemexgate and friends
Fox has not figured out what happened to the 130 million pesos were delivered via the parliamentary factions of the PRD and other parties in addition to the contributions of activists and institutions, the movement of López Obrador. Let alone how much was the recognized historical contribution, so it was said, the SME, in this movement. It's actually a river of money that parties and handle this kind of movement that allows its leaders to live for years without even explaining where they come from many resources, how they live and how they can do as well. Bejarano's case is paradigmatic: six years without work, plus a period supposedly in jail (actually, arranged as a resort to spend those months) and not a single witness to know what lives.
does not bother me personally that the son of López Obrador fit tennis twelve thousand dollars or to have fun with their friends on a yacht trip around the world or to give away 80 000 Bejarano pantries EMS workers .
What must have is a bit of consistency and whether they are public figures publicly explain where they come from all these resources. But we will not have those answers while the authorities, all, allow them to continue to serve so many with such impunity. 
Jorge Fernández Menéndez Reasons
29-Oct-2009
Something is wrong in our matches, particularly on the left: Martin Esparza, in the conflict the disappearance of Luz y Fuerza del Centro, is busy remodeling his ranch in Hidalgo, where he raises horses Creoles. Andres Jr., the son of López Obrador, boasting of his tennis thousand dollar Louis Vuitton, its yacht trips New York, their friends and entertainment on Facebook and Twitter, also reached there to criticize the newspapers and party leaders in which his father supposedly military. The buildings that manages and builds René Bejarano people should be evicted because they are about to fall, but the illustrious René can afford to give away groceries to EMS, to be in public events with Flavio Sosa and Esparza and indulge of increasing weight in the López Obrador. Claudia Sheinbaum is inaugurating houses, in fact, operational branches of the same movement, and will go 46 more. Adam Lopez, one lout who threw a counterfeit Javier Lozano's face, tells the journalist Rubén Cortés, has a long history of political grasshopper has allowed in nine years, be Madraco, Fox and Lopez Obrador, a whole show of political coherence. And one can not but wonder where does all that money, that contempt even by the most elementary forms of law and policy.
large extent is impunity. Tomorrow, the IFE will officially unveil the opinion by which it relieves the PRD have received money from businessman Carlos Ahumada in the 2003 elections as a result of an investigation over five years, after complaints from PRI and PAN, by the famous video showing the then officials and party leaders, René Bejarano and Carlos Imaz, among others, taking hundreds of thousands of dollars from Ahumada offices. Has never known what Bejarano and Imaz did with the money and the authorities have been so strict in prosecuting the businessman who claimed to be blackmailed by these characters, who have not had time or desire to find out.
But even after five years, so has the IFE. The explanation given by the Electoral Institute for waiving the case to the PRD is absurd, although they have spent nearly 400 pages to develop: they say that the dates on which Ahumada claimed some contracts in the Mexico City government do not coincide with the dates they gave that money to Bejarano and Imaz, therefore, that money could not go to the game, as if the contract payment was the only source of income that had Ahumada. Indeed, this promise, in an interview he did in May, have given about 200 million pesos to this party, besides having paid, among other things, including to trips to Europe of some of its leaders, the debt I had the PRD campaign Televisa 2003. Was it so difficult to know who paid and by what means that debt? Apparently so, because the IFE decided that it was not a crime. The truth is that with less than that built the case Pemexgate and friends
Fox has not figured out what happened to the 130 million pesos were delivered via the parliamentary factions of the PRD and other parties in addition to the contributions of activists and institutions, the movement of López Obrador. Let alone how much was the recognized historical contribution, so it was said, the SME, in this movement. It's actually a river of money that parties and handle this kind of movement that allows its leaders to live for years without even explaining where they come from many resources, how they live and how they can do as well. Bejarano's case is paradigmatic: six years without work, plus a period supposedly in jail (actually, arranged as a resort to spend those months) and not a single witness to know what lives.
does not bother me personally that the son of López Obrador fit tennis twelve thousand dollars or to have fun with their friends on a yacht trip around the world or to give away 80 000 Bejarano pantries EMS workers .
What must have is a bit of consistency and whether they are public figures publicly explain where they come from all these resources. But we will not have those answers while the authorities, all, allow them to continue to serve so many with such impunity.
How To Dip Snuff Pouches
boat rides, a hobby over Andres Manuel junior
Georgina Morett / Millennium
My usual I woke up and read the newspapers hurt me, says Facebook. In their bondage
quote: I explained to my girl as taxes and was outraged.
"I explained to my girl as taxes and q is more outraged me. If the whole country context is very different," writes Andrés Manuel López Beltrán, who has among his hobbies yacht with friends.
The son of former presidential candidate has 273 thousand Facebook friends who are shown pictures of 87 different clubs in New York and in yachting, but also on Twitter talk of taxes and its relationship with bondage
And certainly makes misspelled: "Neta q QDQ people talk defending the internet in the Senate? Minimum preparence whether to represent a comunidad.No m feel represented."
Reading his comments could be mistaken for a fussy about whether it is the son of former head of Government or the son of former President Vicente Fox, and writes: "I think my practice q d peroodicos wake up and read in these times SM only thing done is hurt. Really need that vacation. "
Andrés Manuel López Beltrán, who according to his profile was born on 21 August 1986 and seeks "friendship, dating, casual, whatever" on his Facebook page, made strong criticisms Twitter PRD legislators at the time taxes were discussed:
"I do not get to spend saliva q PRD deputies if d anyway do not take into account and will be majoritarian. Being part legitimate, "he says, then refers to the President of the Board of the Senate," Navarrete Porq speaks to the table as if they were small children? Q jajajaja him? twitter jajajajaja are not idiots. "
The middle son of Andrés Manuel López Obrador also deals with international issues in his talks, and specifically talking about the U.S. President: Barack Obama is falling this month of my grace. First accept the nobel and now dances with thalia.
The son of former presidential candidate who had the slogan "first the poor", writes with a certain laziness that will have to celebrate the birthday of his younger brother in a meeting with just 300 people.
Also referred to Twitter a controversial issue where there was extensive involvement of his father.
Commenting at school "d most fun was when my class teacher fell d the chair while outlining some partners about Juanito."
And as a representative of the generation that grew up with Internet, says talks about how López Obrador began using Twitter, and even says that "went well twiteador. Sure jajaj jaja twitteador Lopez now. "
And boy, posing in their photos on Facebook with different women, most of them pretty, says: "Since my dad has twitter q my guilty pleasure is to see who it is ... And the truth is I'm envious q q have so beautiful. "
and discusses how his dad has advanced in the technology:" For my father is no longer enough now wants to upload audio letters. Twitter from Q has devoted more time to his q to mine. "
social networks you have access to much of the population and allow us to observe any part of the profile of the son of former PRD presidential candidate, the least 273 thousand Facebook friends you have in accessing their photos and comments, as well as anyone wishing to enter Twitter can learn about their opinions.
- Keys
The tennis
• The revelation about the tennis of $ 870, about 11 thousand 900 pesos, which uses the son of López Obrador was collected by a large number of electronic media and criticized by the entire spectrum of commentators and drivers.
• Carmen Aristegui, whom Lopez Obrador says the only journalist who respects said about it: "The question is, if you are Louis Vuitton, how much does Louis Vuitton sneakers? ... With the speech clearly flying his father, it is very contrasting and shocking in the end. And if not original, it means that they are pirates. " -------------------------------------------------
------------------------------- Source URL: http://www.milenio.com/node/310852
quote: I explained to my girl as taxes and was outraged.
"I explained to my girl as taxes and q is more outraged me. If the whole country context is very different," writes Andrés Manuel López Beltrán, who has among his hobbies yacht with friends.
The son of former presidential candidate has 273 thousand Facebook friends who are shown pictures of 87 different clubs in New York and in yachting, but also on Twitter talk of taxes and its relationship with bondage
And certainly makes misspelled: "Neta q QDQ people talk defending the internet in the Senate? Minimum preparence whether to represent a comunidad.No m feel represented."
Reading his comments could be mistaken for a fussy about whether it is the son of former head of Government or the son of former President Vicente Fox, and writes: "I think my practice q d peroodicos wake up and read in these times SM only thing done is hurt. Really need that vacation. "
Andrés Manuel López Beltrán, who according to his profile was born on 21 August 1986 and seeks "friendship, dating, casual, whatever" on his Facebook page, made strong criticisms Twitter PRD legislators at the time taxes were discussed:
"I do not get to spend saliva q PRD deputies if d anyway do not take into account and will be majoritarian. Being part legitimate, "he says, then refers to the President of the Board of the Senate," Navarrete Porq speaks to the table as if they were small children? Q jajajaja him? twitter jajajajaja are not idiots. "
The middle son of Andrés Manuel López Obrador also deals with international issues in his talks, and specifically talking about the U.S. President: Barack Obama is falling this month of my grace. First accept the nobel and now dances with thalia.
The son of former presidential candidate who had the slogan "first the poor", writes with a certain laziness that will have to celebrate the birthday of his younger brother in a meeting with just 300 people.
Also referred to Twitter a controversial issue where there was extensive involvement of his father.
Commenting at school "d most fun was when my class teacher fell d the chair while outlining some partners about Juanito."
And as a representative of the generation that grew up with Internet, says talks about how López Obrador began using Twitter, and even says that "went well twiteador. Sure jajaj jaja twitteador Lopez now. "
And boy, posing in their photos on Facebook with different women, most of them pretty, says: "Since my dad has twitter q my guilty pleasure is to see who it is ... And the truth is I'm envious q q have so beautiful. "
and discusses how his dad has advanced in the technology:" For my father is no longer enough now wants to upload audio letters. Twitter from Q has devoted more time to his q to mine. "
social networks you have access to much of the population and allow us to observe any part of the profile of the son of former PRD presidential candidate, the least 273 thousand Facebook friends you have in accessing their photos and comments, as well as anyone wishing to enter Twitter can learn about their opinions.
- Keys
The tennis
• The revelation about the tennis of $ 870, about 11 thousand 900 pesos, which uses the son of López Obrador was collected by a large number of electronic media and criticized by the entire spectrum of commentators and drivers.
• Carmen Aristegui, whom Lopez Obrador says the only journalist who respects said about it: "The question is, if you are Louis Vuitton, how much does Louis Vuitton sneakers? ... With the speech clearly flying his father, it is very contrasting and shocking in the end. And if not original, it means that they are pirates. " -------------------------------------------------
------------------------------- Source URL: http://www.milenio.com/node/310852
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)